Thursday, 12 May 2011, 14:00
Cybernetica Bldg (Akadeemia tee 21), room B101
Slides from the talk [pdf]
Abstract: In the proof assistant Coq, one can model certain classes of graphs by coinductive types. The coinductive aspects account for infinite navigability already in finite but cyclic graphs, as in rational trees. Coq's static checks exclude simple-minded definitions with lists of successors of a node. We show how to mimic lists by a type of functions and build a Coq theory for such graphs. Naturally, these coinductive structures have to be compared by a bisimulation relation, and we define it in a generic way. However, there are many cases in which we would not like to distinguish between graphs that are constructed differently and that are thus not bisimilar, in particular if only the order of elements in the lists of successors is not the same. We present a wider bisimulation relation that allows permutations. Technical problems arise with their specification since (1) elements have to be compared by a not necessarily decidable relation and (2) coinductive types are mixed with inductive ones. Still, a formal development has been carried out in Coq, by using its built-in language for proof automation. Another extension of the original bisimulation relation based on cycle analysis provides indifference concerning the root node of the term graphs.
(Joint work with Ralph Matthes.)
Celia Picard's visit to Tallinn is supported by the ETF/Egide Parrot programme.